RE: [Non-intrusion Q] Is this normal FTP and TCP"underneath it" behavior?

"Bill Royds" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.intrusions
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Remember that in standard FTP (not passive with PASV), the data connection is
initiated by the server with the FTP client as listener (reversing the standard
client-server relationship). So what you are seeing is the server (as client in
the data connection) sending the reset saying it is out of synch and your client
(as server) agreeing with indication of last data received (or sent). 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stef
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 12:48 PM
To: Intrusions List (GCIA Practicals)
Subject: [Intrusions] [Non-intrusion Q] Is this normal FTP and TCP"underneath
it" behavior?

This is a non-intrusion question, which, though, I have thought of
being worth debating with you - TCP/IP gurus. I have an odd behavior
of an FTP server-client communication, which I call "odd" because I
have not found anything in the RFCs I tried, or in Steven's book,
explaining the following:

- in a scheduled (every hour) ftp "conversation" between a client and
a server (which conversation consists in a simple upload and download
of some files, each one taking approximately 2 minutes), every once in
a while such a session fails with the following last packets:

server --> client packet: flags: RST, ACK=0 (! - the ACK in those RSTs
is always 0)
client --> server packet: flags: RST(!!! -as if there is a standard to
force a RST from the client, in response to a RST from server?!?) and
SEQ = "number", ACK = "number" (!! - the ACK in the client "reply"
RSTs is always equal to its own sequence number, and not related to
the SEQ of the server)

NOTE1: the above is always happening over the data connections (never
over the control one)

NOTE2: normal traffic ends ... well, normally: FIN --> ACK --> FIN --> ACK

Could anyone tell me what they think of this, or point me to the place
where the above may be explained?!?

TIA,
Stef
_______________________________________________
Intrusions mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions

_______________________________________________
Intrusions mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.