HSRP under attack ... or just Cisco glitch and hickup?!?
Stef <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.intrusions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <cad4cac704112714271f3f1af1__34486.5702595145$1101653276$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
Sorry for cross-posting - but who knows where an idea or prior experience sharing may be coming from?!? ;) We have just recovered from a network disaster, and I will start in a little while looking through some logs. Meanwhile - I just thought of picking some analyst brains here - in regards to an odd incident. Environment: dual Cisco 6500, in HSRP mode, running 12.1(11b)E. These two have some FastEth and GiGE blades, connecting servers, and are also redundantly connected to some 4000s, which connect to workstations. Same 6500s are connected (redundantly, also) to a pair of Checkpoint firewalls, running VRRP, for Internet connectivity, and some other Netscreen firewalls, for other type of network segregation (very simplistic description - no need here to describe all sorts of VLANs, as I do not deem that significant to this) Problem: at around 3:00AM this morning there was absolut no connectivity in the network. Specific probes, placed on some spanned ports, for specific device monitoring, were not capturing any traffic. No DHCP machines could get to the DHCP server. The firewall internal interface was showing two types of messages: 1. MAD - land_attack - from the two interfaces of the 6500s connected to it, destined to the localhost (127.0.0.1) - logged 2. protocol 112 traffic (which is VRRP) - dropped The 6500s - if connected to the console - would just show gibberish scrolling very fast on the terminal screen. Their utilization lights (on the hardware itself) were showing above 90%. The netscreens connected were the closest to having been able to capture something significant: UDP flood from the two 6500s, on port 1985, destined to 127.0.0.1, port 1985. This last piece of information led me to assuming something like: http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2002/06/msg00043.html but - as I was not able to get my hands on any significant logs yet - was left as just a possibility (and part of my question). Under the pressure of time I have resorted to shutting down the 6500s (one at a time), then bringing them up - and the whole problem just vanished! So - to the point - has anybody seen this type of flakiness in the implementation - itself - of HSRP for Cisco, or has anybody seen an actual attack - as described here: http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5CP051F4AK.html - which would just go away upon 6500s reset (because of the temporary nature of the original stimulus). Obviously - both options worry me - but for two different reasons. I have left - for now - some probes (sniffers) running, and I plan digging further in any logs I may find, a little later on ... TIA, Stef _______________________________________________ Intrusions mailing list [email protected] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions