RE: brightstor/arcserve backup client hacked
"Smith, Donald" <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:30:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.intrusions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9921AB57EA49D242A076864C5F473D3C021551FB@itdene2km08.AD.QINTRA.COM> |
Port 41523 could be a legit source port and therefore a possible destination port in a response packet. If you block a port most OSes will retry access a few times usually using a differnent highnumber port. It shouldn't hurt anything to leave that blocked unless you are doing arcserver over the internet:) [email protected] giac -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of Andrew Daviel Sent: Tue 3/1/2005 12:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Intrusions] brightstor/arcserve backup client hacked As 3 people have asked me for capture files, I have placed a tcpdump capture file with 2 targets on http://andrew.triumf.ca/arckit/ together with some rootkit files The capture is only 300 bytes/packet as I recall We had I think 23 targets so there's more data available if required. If the rootkit server's still up it's possible to login using the info from the capture. I did email the webmaster (virtual university in Czeck republic). Later investigation found an ftp server running on port 187 (one of the cloaked ports) and the attacker later logged in on this and ran some bandwidth tests. I presume that the intent was to store pirated media. Our PC guys are running around with a program called "RootKitRevealer" patching the infected systems from a rescue disk. Meanwhile we blocked port 187 and also the original ARCserve port 41523 pending an update of the backup client. Just trying to think if 41523 might be used as a legitimate inbound port for http requests, ftp, NFS etc. Maybe. Linux kernel seems to use local ports between 1024 & 4999 but a comment says "For high-usage systems, use sysctl to change this to 32768-61000". Which I presume is legal, so maybe we don't want to statically block 41523 at the router indefinitely ... My tcp's rusty - if a packet fails on one port will it be retried on another port or the same one ? -- Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada Tel. +1 (604) 222-7376 (Pacific Time) [email protected] _______________________________________________ Intrusions mailing list [email protected] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions _______________________________________________ Intrusions mailing list [email protected] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions