paper + name
<auto97841-revL73yDgGBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:06:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.invisiblenet.iip.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
another morphmix paper that goes into a lot more detail (performance models, detailed attack descriptions, and other good stuff): http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/rennhard03anonymous.html (81page PDF, so take warning and don't try to read it all in one sitting) also, I was going through the meeting logs and saw the brief discussion about the name stuff when my IIP connection was b0rked: 7:08 <nop> the question I'm having 17:08 <nop> is the name 17:08 <nop> shall we move it to InvisibleNet? or Invisible Internet Project My personal preference is NOT to go with Invisible Internet Project, since it has the same acronym as the Invisible IRC Project. Since no one ever types out the full name, discussing IIP becomes very hard (nop can attest to how many times I had to ask him "which IIP?" when he and I were discussing this stuff earlier). If we could go to InvisibleNet Project (INP) or InvisibleNet Communication Project (ICP) or something else with a different acronym, that'd be really really cool. The IRC project is a seperate and distinct project from the underlying network project and we should do what we can to make sure we don't confuse people (and if any of us get confused, we can be sure that people not involved in the project will definitely be confused).. Thoughts? -jrandom Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?subloc=messenger&l=434 Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427