Sounds good!
"Lance James" <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Aug 2003 12:36:12 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.invisiblenet.iip.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <007901c359f6$7fa013d0$c842420a@lancexp> |
well, my input on the matter is that it might require a zero knowledge proof model, that would allow people to trust dns even the first time they come across a new site. Maybe utilizing station to station protocol to build trust might be a good thing. 0x90 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hezekiah" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 6:36 AM Subject: [iip-dev] Sounds good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all! :) I had thought of setting up some kind of thing like this, but I only had a general concept. This sounds fairly well thought out and is far superiour to my idea. I like it! :) Does anyone else out there (possiblely with experiance in dealing with NS issuses like this) have input on wiht's idea? -- Hezekiah On Sunday, August 03, 2003 06:27, wiht wrote: > I have had trouble falling asleep tonight, and as a result I had the idea > described below. After thinking about it for some time, I have concluded > that I2P (the Invisible Internet Protocol) will benefit from a naming > service application (hereafter NS). > > As currently specified in the protocol, communication between two > destinations can occur only if one knows how to contact the other. In other > words, the first destination will have to know the second's IP address or > hash to communicate. This information will have to be given to the first > destination beforehand. What if the destination is not known, but I know > that I want to contact a certain person and establish an instant messaging > session? > > The NS application, running over the I2P network, would solve this problem. > For example, user1 wants to speak with user2 via Instant Messenger. user1's > IM client would look up user2 in a name server, and obtain the > corresponding contact information. If user2 does not have IM capabilities, > the NS would tell user1 this. Users (or entities, rather) who wanted to > simplify being contacted by others would, at their option, register with a > name server, where others could look them up. Now, instead of having to > type in user2's IP address, user1 could type in "user2:im" as the > destination to connect to (or "user2:www", as another example). > > The naming service would have several capabilities. Entities could register > with it (possibly paying hashcash for the service), add records for > services they provide at their destinations (IM, WWW, NS, etc.), and modify > and delete these records. Records would be signed with an established > public key so that only the entity establishing the record could modify it. > A record would contain the following data: > > Name of the entity > Public key for entity > Hash( Destination ) for contact purposes > List of services or applications one can connect to at that destination. > > If anything I said above is unclear, please ask questions. The idea needs > development, but I believe that applications running over I2P would benefit > from a NS application. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/LQ/1eHiZTMH32ioRAsfuAJ46yeEcFn/FgdgK3x9Xf8bBruzlTwCfR7Cu LwiYXMCFzGHxCgMVsOldC9A= =HoAn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----