Re: GLIBC Error when building trun on 64 bit only.

Olaf Westrik wrote:

> On 2011-02-03 10:05, David W Studeman wrote:
> 
> [some scary details deleted]
> 
>> Turned out I have an stone too large to pass so they put a
>> ureteral stent between my left kidney and bladder to bypass it and I will
>> get it shattered by lithotripsy soon.
> 
> Hope you get well soon.
> 
> 
>> The question is, did I do something to
>> xz while I was sick and forgot about even doing it? I usually don't
>> forget this stuff. I'm baffled. I vaguely remember working on this as I
>> was contemplating going to the hospital. Jeez!
> 
> Probably proves once more that us males should concentrate on 1 thing at
> the same time only, and try and avoid multitasking ;-)
> 
> 
> Olaf
> 
> 

 I appreciate the wishes for good health from you and Gilles. 

I haven't had any difficulty building since I removed my hacked lfs glibc 
that could not have gotten there by itself. It might be time for me to 
upload another build to my site, if for no other reason, to ensure none of 
my uploaded diffs are too old. As far as speed goes, I can run ./make.sh 
prefetch && ./make.sh clean && ./make.sh toolchain && ./make.sh build and 
wind up with a shiny iso in about 50 minutes on my 64 bit machine here. I 
know you reworked ccache recently but wasn't sure you wanted build speed 
data still.
-- 
Dave
http://www.raqcop.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb