Re: [2.0] Plans for next beta version (1.9.18/1.9.19)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Olaf Westrik" <weizen_42-Yz37vSk3/[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [IPCop-devel] [2.0] Plans for next beta version (1.9.18/1.9.19)


> Let's try again ...
>
>
> I am fairly happy with the state we are in. Recent testresults look OK,
> some week ago I started to regularly build the testuites, results are
> here: http://ipcop-addons.ath.cx/ipcop/testresults/
>
> If nothing extremely important comes up, I would like to release the
> next beta version this month, somewhere around 27-30 March.
> Feel free to commit anything you have got till March 26th.
>
> Should there be any problems with the floppy install, I wil just make a
> note about that in the release notes. Time to spend our cycles elsewhere.
>
>
> Olaf
>
schedule is fine for me.
I am actually trying to run some benchmark to figure what the difference
with -fstack-protector-all is.
I compiled php and will try to run phoronix test suite.

I think we should offer a x86_64 kernel and userspace (build64 option under
that machine?).
That will support more memory than 4 GB, support hardware NX, relax the
register number constraint on x86 32 bits (hardening with pie use one
register and x86 arch has not that much).

Gilles


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d