Re: 1.9.15 and cpqarray
Eric Shubert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eric Shubert & Associates |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/22/2011 02:56 AM, John Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 06:16:23PM -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
> <snip>
>> I just installed 1.9.16 on VMware Server 2.0.2, and still no drive found
>> with LSILogic virtual SCSI. BusLogic virtual SCSI works fine, although
>> the BusLogic driver is intended for use with older Windows guests.
>>
>> As mentioned previously, lspci shows:
>> 00:10.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
>> Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 01)
>> for this device with (Centos 5.4) kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5.
>>
>> According to http://communities.vmware.com/thread/201876, the
>> differences are minor and only apply during device driver loading, so
>> i/o speed should not be affected, although the VMware Best Practice
>> document suggests that the LSI Logic SCSI Controller is the better
>> performing one.
>>
>> Note that BusLogic is usually associated with older Windows versions
>> (2k), and LSILogic with newer ones ('03,'08). I don't know how these
>> relate to Linux. VMware does recommend LSILogic for use with later
>> RedHat distros though.
>>
>> I think it would be best if IPCop supported the LSILogic driver. Is
>> there anything I can do to help in this regard?
>
> I would guess this is a regression bug in either IPCop's kernel config
> or (unlikely) VMWare.
>
> When I first tested IPCop 1.9 (1.9.5 I think) with VMWare 2.0 I meet
> the same problem with the LSI Logic emulation, but this was working
> with IPCop 1.9.7:
> http://marc.info/?l=ipcop-devel&m=125070938032033&w=3
>
> I would test your copy of VMware with 1.9.7 to see if the problem is
> in IPCop or VMWare. If it is IPCop then compare the two kernel config
> files for any SCSI changes.
>
>
> ps. VMWare Server is now end of life, with no support available.
> Virtual Box is a nice simple alternative, assuming that Oracle
> don't drop it or mess it up in the future.
>
>
Thanks John. I guess I've been living under a rock regarding VMware. :(
Looks like I'll be evaluating/switching my virtualization platform when
CentOS6 is available (before summer if we're lucky). I'll be taking a
close look at VirtualBox (I want/need USB), but I'm hoping that KVM will
pan out.
While I still intend to use an IPCop VM, I don't see any point in
spending more time on this presently.
Thanks again.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar