Re: A proposal for a package management system

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:34:28 -0800
Nick Austin <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Michael Rasmussen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It think IPCop could gain a lot by having a package management system.
> > I have therefore attached (added since the list does not accept
> > attachments) a proposal for such a package management system to this
> > mail (I hope it is not removed by the list server).
> 
> Also consider the package management scheme used by OpenWRT:
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/opkg
> 
> !DSPAM:4f1b91f1222412758520239!
> 
> 
Maybe it would be an option to port opkg to IPCop?

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2

_______________________________________________
IPCop-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8b6eUACgkQVErYVePoCReYVACgpzO8V44zlTg1Usz7pwsCNMVy
TdgAnjSK0T3Ggx5Im1rCdcWIkyuFdraY
=2NMg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----