Re: A proposal for a package management system
Michael Rasmussen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:10:11 +0100 Tom Eichstaedt <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 24.01.2012 08:28, schrieb Gilles Espinasse: > > > Yes package management is for me a priority on next version (not 2.0.x, > > probably 2.1) > > We should not forget what IPCop is: > > A firewall. > And your point is? AFAIK even firewalls need patching now and then. The easier patching is the more likely this will be done more often. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ IPCop-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8hnusACgkQVErYVePoCRcOmgCfaIETt3agXQ+6HVcsLIYLo4ry JsYAnir9fk5IU/28qB8/am1wddGL2SWH =AAo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----