Re: [2.1] procps

"Gilles Espinasse" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel
Message-ID <012701ccee3f$10ae23e0$f9b5a8c0@pii350>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Olaf Westrik" <weizen_42-Yz37vSk3/[email protected]>
To: "Gilles Espinasse" <[email protected]>
Cc: "IPCop devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [IPCop-devel] [2.1] procps


>
> I tried procps-3.3.2.orig.tar.gz from Debian, that seems to work OK and
> should remain stable.
>
...
> > I am not sure 3.3.x is yet ready for immediate consumption. We could
switch
> > later.
> > 3.2.8+patches should be good enought for us.
>
> OK, I will add the patch for 3.2.8 to silence the kernel version message.
>
If we need another patch to support 3.0, maybe really switch to 3.3.2 even
Fedora already has the 3.0 patch on 3.2 tree.

I tested 3.3.2.3 from debian
Compilation is much cleaner. There is 9 failures in test suite (but there
was no tests on 3.2).
We could try 3.3.2, that is a very isolated part and should not have wide
effect on our tree.
I could commit that.

Gilles



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.