Re: glib /pkg-config upgrade
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <385782761.103966608.1333180379316.JavaMail.root@zimbra33-e6.priv.proxad.net> |
----- Mail original ----- > De: "Olaf Westrik" <[email protected]> > À: "g esp" <[email protected]> > Cc: "IPCop devel" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Mars 2012 21:33:41 > Objet: Re: [IPCop-devel] glib /pkg-config upgrade > > On 2012-03-24 19:49, [email protected] wrote: > > I figured how to solve or hide the glib test failures during glib > > upgrade to 2.30.3. > > I really solve GDateTime issue using > > TZDIR=/usr/share/zoneinfo/posix during tests. > > For the dbus error, I managed to skip bus tests as we have no usage > > if dbus. > > > > But I am still battling to build glib-2.30 without python. > > Probably building Python before glib will the easiest. > > > > What do you mind about the python move? > > My first preference would be to drop it completely. > Failing that, I do not mind moving it. > > IIRC we have only 1 use for python at the moment, mklibs. > The main reason for having mklibs is size reduction for floppy > images, > but since we can't build those anymore, how about we drop mklibs? > > > Olaf > I slightly disagree for "can't build anymore". I have uncommited changes that could fix that. This stay uncommited as there is no request, I haven't yet run tested that and there is still some minor fixes needed in the changes. I think a x86_64 build is a much higher priority. Anyway, I was not able to build glib-2.30 without python. I am sure that could be done, but that may not be easy and maybe not so maintainable. For thoses reasons, the python move is the easiest. Gilles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ IPCop-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-devel