Re: linux-headers upgrade to 3.0.39
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1591148174.94441831.1344116951408.JavaMail.root@zimbra33-e6.priv.proxad.net> |
----- Mail original ----- > De: "Olaf Westrik" <[email protected]> > À: "IPCop devel" <[email protected]> > Cc: "g esp" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Samedi 4 Août 2012 19:03:46 > Objet: Re: [IPCop-devel] linux-headers upgrade to 3.0.39 > > Hi Gilles, > > > > I tried Olaf suggestion to upgrade the kernel headers and result > > look good. > > snip snip > > > So I would conclude upgrading the kernel headers to 3.0.39 is a > > good thing to do. > > Me too, somewhat suprised by the few changes required. > Should be the result of user-space NO_REGRESSION mantra. In fact, our packages are mostly all up to date (except udev, glibc, perl, gcc and dependencies) > Can you commit the change to lfs/linux-headers? After that I'll bump > the toolchain version. I am looking why our lfs/linux-headers has this line when LFS no more had that line cd $(DIR_APP) && sed -i '/scsi/d' include/Kbuild That instruction existed in LFS-6.3 with kernel headers 2.6.22 and glibc-2.5 to use instead glibc-2.5 scsi headers This was removed during LFS-6.4 (with kernel 2.6.27, glibc-2.8). LFS-6.6 with kernel headers 2.6.32 and glibc-2.11 do not have that line, so I suspect we miss to remove that line while upgrading. I don't know the exact effect that would have, still rebuilding with that line removed. Gilles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ IPCop-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-devel