Re: linux-headers upgrade to 3.0.39

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel
Message-ID <1591148174.94441831.1344116951408.JavaMail.root@zimbra33-e6.priv.proxad.net>

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Olaf Westrik" <[email protected]>
> À: "IPCop devel" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "g esp" <[email protected]>
> Envoyé: Samedi 4 Août 2012 19:03:46
> Objet: Re: [IPCop-devel] linux-headers upgrade to 3.0.39
> 
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> 
> > I tried Olaf suggestion to upgrade the kernel headers and result
> > look good.
> 
> snip snip
> 
> > So I would conclude upgrading the kernel headers to 3.0.39 is a
> > good thing to do.
> 
> Me too, somewhat suprised by the few changes required.
> 
Should be the result of user-space NO_REGRESSION mantra.
In fact, our packages are mostly all up to date (except udev, glibc, perl, gcc and dependencies)

> Can you commit the change to lfs/linux-headers? After that I'll bump
> the toolchain version.

I am looking why our lfs/linux-headers has this line when LFS no more had that line
   cd $(DIR_APP) && sed -i '/scsi/d' include/Kbuild

That instruction existed in LFS-6.3 with kernel headers 2.6.22 and glibc-2.5 to use instead glibc-2.5 scsi headers
This was removed during LFS-6.4 (with kernel 2.6.27, glibc-2.8).
LFS-6.6 with kernel headers 2.6.32 and glibc-2.11 do not have that line, so I suspect we miss to remove that line while upgrading.

I don't know the exact effect that would have, still rebuilding with that line removed.

Gilles

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
IPCop-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.