Re: USB Backup Fails on Raid in recent builds.

On 2014-01-11 03:32, David W Studeman wrote:

> It would appear that the patch is not enough to make the existing udev work
> with the new mdadm rules as I had hoped it would. It does however at least
> point the disk by id to the proper md arrays this time around.

OK, but since we do not have /dev/disk/by-id on a standard IPCop there 
is no need for it.


> The patch I referenced earlier seems to be geared for>  udev-171-r8.
>
> At this point I honestly don't know exactly what it would take to make udev
> 166 work with mdadm 3.3 udev raid rules as there are many differences in the
> newer udev compared to 166. To be clear, It was the old mdadm udev rules
> that made it work thus far in my tests with the existing udev.

I've made a small modification in the new rules to work with our udev.
Tested to give us by-label, by-path and by-uuid same as we have without 
RAID.


Olaf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk