Re: IPv6 supported?
Tapani Tarvainen <ipcop-IXVv/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Jungersen, Danjel - Jungersen Grafisk ApS ([email protected]) wrote: > If I understand this discussion correctly ipv6 is not routed? Of course IPv6 is routed. It is not NATted, however. > Does this mean that an ipv6 network cannot be private? No, it doesn't. Private networks in IPv6 are different than in IPv4, however, and the term "private" is not used in exactly same way. > If I switch to ipv6 I would very much prefer to have my own small > closed secure network isolated from the rest of the world. You can have it. As secure and as isolated as you want. > As far as I can read, on wiki for instance, routing is possible. > > If routing is possible, so are private networks (?) You seem to be confused about what "routing" means. Private networks are specifically *not* routable in the global Internet; that's what makes them private. (They're of course still routable in their own intranet.) > If private networks are possible, ipcop should support this (?) IPCop should eventually support IPv6 with all bells and whistles, period. It may be debated how urgent that is, but it's ultimate need is really not debatable. And I think it's getting urgent pretty soon. -- Tapani Tarvainen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ IPCop-user mailing list [email protected] Manage your subscription or unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user