Re: "Debian as My home firewall/router" on the debian-user mailing list

David Christensen <dpchrist-xyI/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.ipcop.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 02/28/2016 06:23 AM, Administrator wrote:
>
> On Saturday 27 Feb 2016 11:20:49 David Christensen wrote:
>
>> ipcop-user:
>>
>> There is a thread "Debian as My home firewall/router" on the debian-user
>> mailing list.  One poster mentioned IPCop as a possible solution, but
>> another has claimed that there are significant flaws in IPCop.  I used
>> IPCop for many years, and found it to be very useful.  I am curious if
>> the criticism is accurate.
>>
>>
>> It would be helpful if a person knowledgeable in the IPCop project and
>> IPCop internals joined the discussion:
>>
>>       https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
>>
>>       https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/02/msg00963.html
>>
>>
>> David
>
> My view on this is different as I'm knowledgeable but not an expert.  I have 4
> choices: use a retail gateway / firewall device; use IPCop / pfsense or
> something similar; use a professional gateway / firewall device; hand-roll my
> own on top of a trusted distribution.
>
> Retail devices are repeatedly reported for security flaws which remain un-
> patched for months.  That's a fail.
>
> Professional devices are better, but expensive and complex to set up securely.
> Hand-rolled gateway / firewall on top of a generic distribution is even more
> complex to set up securely and maintain.  I don't have the time for either.
>
> Complexity is a security risk, as is the need for perpetual learning to keep
> up-to-date on the latest threats and best practice.
>
> That leaves IPCop / pfsense ... they strike a good balance between security
> and complexity, with the cost being acceptable :-)
>
> YMMV
> David

I did a similar calculation and came up with a similar result.


I'm currently using a residential gateway provided by AT&T U-verse.  The 
first died within 24 hours.  The second has been up for months without 
reboot, and seems to be fast and have strong radios.  But, the feature 
set is small, I have no idea of the quality of security, and I have no 
idea if it has been updating/ patching itself (I certainly have not 
updated it).


But, none of the above addresses the IPCop-specific issues raised on the 
debian-user mailing list.  They would be most properly addressed on that 
list; please see the URL's I posted, above.


David


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
IPCop-user mailing list
[email protected]
Manage your subscription or unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.