Re: "Debian as My home firewall/router" on the debian-user mailing list
David Christensen <dpchrist-xyI/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 02/28/2016 06:23 AM, Administrator wrote: > > On Saturday 27 Feb 2016 11:20:49 David Christensen wrote: > >> ipcop-user: >> >> There is a thread "Debian as My home firewall/router" on the debian-user >> mailing list. One poster mentioned IPCop as a possible solution, but >> another has claimed that there are significant flaws in IPCop. I used >> IPCop for many years, and found it to be very useful. I am curious if >> the criticism is accurate. >> >> >> It would be helpful if a person knowledgeable in the IPCop project and >> IPCop internals joined the discussion: >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/02/msg00963.html >> >> >> David > > My view on this is different as I'm knowledgeable but not an expert. I have 4 > choices: use a retail gateway / firewall device; use IPCop / pfsense or > something similar; use a professional gateway / firewall device; hand-roll my > own on top of a trusted distribution. > > Retail devices are repeatedly reported for security flaws which remain un- > patched for months. That's a fail. > > Professional devices are better, but expensive and complex to set up securely. > Hand-rolled gateway / firewall on top of a generic distribution is even more > complex to set up securely and maintain. I don't have the time for either. > > Complexity is a security risk, as is the need for perpetual learning to keep > up-to-date on the latest threats and best practice. > > That leaves IPCop / pfsense ... they strike a good balance between security > and complexity, with the cost being acceptable :-) > > YMMV > David I did a similar calculation and came up with a similar result. I'm currently using a residential gateway provided by AT&T U-verse. The first died within 24 hours. The second has been up for months without reboot, and seems to be fast and have strong radios. But, the feature set is small, I have no idea of the quality of security, and I have no idea if it has been updating/ patching itself (I certainly have not updated it). But, none of the above addresses the IPCop-specific issues raised on the debian-user mailing list. They would be most properly addressed on that list; please see the URL's I posted, above. David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ IPCop-user mailing list [email protected] Manage your subscription or unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user