Re: BoF slot applied for...

At 01:50 PM 9/30/2002 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> no, I think we should hold until we've have more experience with actual
> >> deployment of the things, like sshfp and ipseckey, people are working on.
> > It is not clear to me how those items can even advance.
>
>you need a security ad, smb or jis, to help you move it.
>
>randy

no, you need to show you have your act together.  you can do that
by conning an AD into letting you move something forward, or you
can show strong consensus (by, for example, showing multiple
interested parties with running code and a coherent document.)

Harassing the AD's into helping you publish something is the ALTERNATE
path.