Re: RFFR

> i'd like to see fields named as they are in ethereal; and i'd prefer to 
> see integration with an ethereal library rather than directly with pcap,
> so that parsed packets would be available.

Those are some slick ideas but I'd like it as an option (god I'm 
predictable but I really like flexibility) of some kind at first... then 
after a suitable period of time revisit it and see if history supports a 
tighter integration.

However I know very little, or rather nothing I should say, about the 
internal nature of the ethereal libs.  Do they operate fundamentally the 
same or would it mean deep libnet reworking... perhaps the start of the 
libnet-2.x branch? ;)

Regards,
Byron


-- 

For Good, return Good. For Evil, return Justice.