Re: RFFR
Aaron Turner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.libnet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:01:33AM +0100, Frédéric Raynal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:54:37AM -0500, Kathleen Poulsen wrote: > > > > 1 file descriptor per interface rather than per context (i think > > this is underway). > > Yep. > > Note that it will very certainly break the current API :-( Breaking the API is bad. People still haven't recovered (ie: ported all the code) from the last API. I can't speak for anyone other then myself, but I can say that I will have to seriously consider switching to something other then libnet if the API breaks and there is no simple means for the current and new API's to co-exist on the same box. I just can't keep expecting my users to keep jumping through hoops to compile my code like that. -- Aaron Turner <aturner at pobox.com|synfin.net> http://synfin.net/ They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin All emails are PGP signed; a lack of a signature indicates a forgery.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 254 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at: http://www.synfin.net/aturner/pgpkey.asc iD8DBQFAEASghweYF/hu2uYRAn6zAJ4pyS6OP52uhTBbaRN556MAkvHltACfTZGZ yS5/LotWLAJth5wgNIOgkjE= =G0eF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----