Re: CAN-2004-1137
Ray Anthony <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Check that link you included with your message again. There's a working fix on there if I'm not mistaken. "It is reported that the following sysctl variables may be set to disable IGMP functionality: net.ipv4.igmp_max_msf = 0 net.ipv4.igmp_max_memberships = 0 net.ipv4.icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses = 1 " So to set these you'd just run sysctl -w net.ipv4.igmp_max_msf=0 Hope this helps. -Ray --- hilton de meillon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Can anyone tell me why not many distros have an > update for the CAN-2004-1137 > (among other kernel vulnerabilities) yet ?. > > Ubuntu, Redhat, SuSe have updated kernels but pretty > much all the rest do > not have an updated kernel for this issue. > > Secondly would 'iptables -A INPUT -p IGMP -j REJECT' > protect my machine from > remote attacks ?. > > I tried this rule and then ran the proof of concept > exploit from > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11917/solution/ and > it still crashed my > (slackware) machine. I am assuming that it connects > over a unix socket or > exploits one of the non-networked vulnerabilities as > according to secfocus > there are three actual vulnerabilities contained in > this vulnerability. > > Lastly I would have to say that this is a bit of a > shocker for the linux > community, this vulnerability could be used with > devastating effect, I am a > bit disappointed with linux in this regard. > > Any comments appreciated. > > hilton > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com