Re: Samba vs NFS
Luiz Felipe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jennifer, With NFS, the authentication is performed just by IP address. This authentication my may be forged more easily than SMB, which is done by login/pass. At this point, SMB is more secure. If is not a hard work for you, use a ssh tunnel from clients to server using SMB. I think it is a quite more secure than pure SMB. Regards, Luiz Felipe de souza Gomes - luizfox Network Administrator Jennifer Fountain wrote: >Hi all: >My company is looking at samba or NFS to allow our clients to access >shares from their Windows workstations and their linux ssh sessions. >>From a security standpoint, which option is "more" secure? Which option >is more vulnerable than the other? Etc, etc ,etc. I appeciate any >security information about NFS or samba that you may have. > > >Kind Regards, > >Jennifer Fountain >Systems Administrator >R&B Distribution >3400 E Walnut Street >Colmar, PA 18915 > > >. > > >