Re: Samba vs NFS

Luiz Felipe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jennifer,

With NFS, the authentication is performed just by IP address. This 
authentication my may be forged more easily than SMB, which is done by 
login/pass. At this point, SMB is more secure.

If is not a hard work for you, use a ssh tunnel from clients to server 
using SMB.
I think it is a quite more secure than pure SMB.

Regards, 
Luiz Felipe de souza Gomes - luizfox
Network Administrator


Jennifer Fountain wrote:

>Hi all:
>My company is looking at samba or NFS to allow our clients to access
>shares from their Windows workstations and their linux ssh sessions.
>>From a security standpoint, which option is "more" secure?  Which option
>is more vulnerable than the other?  Etc, etc ,etc.  I appeciate any
>security information about NFS or samba that you may have.
>
>
>Kind Regards,
>
>Jennifer Fountain
>Systems Administrator
>R&B Distribution
>3400 E Walnut Street
>Colmar, PA  18915
>
>
>.
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.