Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
Marco Monicelli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF7A9017EA.EC8BA770-ONC12570FA.00557663-C12570FA.00564EE7@marcegaglia.com> |
Not really, totally correct.
If you go to Google and type "Linux+worm", you'll see that an AV for Linux
is not a bad idea nowdays and that you weren't enough informed when you
wrote this reply.
Some example:
Linux.Slapper.Worm
Linux/Lupper.worm.a
Linux.Ramen.Worm
http://news.com.com/New+worm+targets+Linux+systems/2100-7349_3-5938475.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/07/linux_worm/
and I could go on with quoting you links like those....
Moreover, think about the thousands backdoors/trojan for linux that are in
the wild. Think about the famous rootkits which are still around. Maybe an
AV is not the best choice for a Linux system but Snort, tripwire, ethereal
are definitively helpful in keeping your penguin safe.
Cheers
Marco
aka Yog-Sotho
Alexander Klimov
<[email protected]
u> To
[email protected]
18/01/2006 14.01 cc
Subject
Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Benson, Sean M wrote:
> Should you run an anti-virus on linux for non-work issues?
> (Just home Workstations, Laptops, etc.. not mail servers.)
Just answer the following question: have you ever seen a virus which
has infected your linux box? If the answer is no (and I guess this is
the case) then it is pointless to install an anti-virus for internal
use.
--
Regards,
ASK