Re: How secure is the openSUSE Build Service?
Greg Metcalfe <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:52:09 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Organization | Linux Labs |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:16:49 pm Thomas wrote: > Am Mittwoch 07 November 2007 schrieb Eduardo Tongson: > > Aniruddha was asking which is safer. There is a difference between 3rd > > party repositories and official repositories. If you do not trust the > > distribution's official repositories your alternative would be Linux > > from Scratch and individually checking source tarballs. > > Which is - of course - very impracticable. :) > > I think it is *not* less secure. In the case of OSS it doesn't matter > anymore. When you trust several thousands developers around the globe, > hundreds of CVS, SVN, rsync, FTP, HTTP servers used for development and > dozens of distribution then *one* additional layer in the distribution > process doesn't really matter. > > It is a matter of trust and not a matter of security. A matter of trust, not security?!? That's the most bizarre thing I've heard this week, and it's been a very strange week. Security is fundamentally about trust, from the very basis of how we even attempt to build secure systems--cryptographic primitives such as hash functions. Go back to fundamentals. What's the purpose of a password? To enable *trust* that Alice really is Alice.