Re: Vulnerability and Patch-Management in Linux (and other Unix)
Hari Sekhon <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:02:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rainer Duffner wrote: > Hi, > > we've amassed a veritable "zoo" of Unix-versions: RHEL4+5, CentOS5, > FreeBSD, Ubuntu and lately Solaris. > We use these for a variety of reasons and each system does its job > quite well. > > However, patch-management seems to be a weak spot in most cases. > RedHat offers "RedHat Network", but it costs a lot of money (and they > charge more if you want to put your servers in groups in the RHN - WTF?) > FreeBSD offers the portaudit database - we should be able to hack > together something with that. > But what about CentOS? If you have an array of CentOS servers - how do > you track which vulnerabilities each one has? > Running yum update every night is no option. > > Does CentOS also maintain a vulnerability database along the lines of > FreeBSD? > How about Solaris? > Ubuntu? > > How do you track vulnerabilities across your datacenter? > > > Regards, > > Rainer > For CentOS: Nagios + check_yum (a plugin I wrote for Nagios to test for updates on RedHat/CentOS servers). You will find it here http://www.nagiosexchange.org/cgi-bin/page.cgi?g=Detailed%2F2577.html;d=1 You may need to copy and paste that link as the funny links used on nagiosexchange don't always come out well in mail clients. For Ubuntu: Nagios + check_apt (from the standard Nagios plugins). I have checks running every hour to watch for patches on my servers on these distros. If you ever rise to Gentoo, I wrote one for that too, you can find that here in case you need it: http://www.nagiosexchange.org/cgi-bin/page.cgi?g=Detailed%2F1539.html;d=1 So much for expensive proprietary solutions. Nagios is truly excellent open source. -h -- Hari Sekhon