RE: Bitlocker without PIN
David Lum <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:06:54 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.microsoft |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B789EB8B5BDF@LKO-EXCH01.Americas.nwea.pvt> |
Excellent reply, thank you for this! PGP Whole Disk Encryption works much the same way, as do most other disk en= cryption schemes right? We had the same usability/protection decisions to m= ake when we deployed PGP WDE, and we see the same Sleep/hibernate questions= as well. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER=20 NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 503.548.5229 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On= Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:44 PM To: Thor (Hammer of God); Per Thorsheim; focus-ms Subject: RE: Bitlocker without PIN Shang, Your question has triggered a healthy discussion. I want to start by sayin= g that I work for Microsoft. I am by no means an experienced security anal= yst, I am a Technical Professional that has had numerous conversations with= customers and partners around disk encryption. Let me start by directly a= nswering your questions: First, let us assume we are protecting our data from a thief who is going t= o steal our laptop. In my mind, it's very important that we focus on the t= ype of threat we are trying to mitigate. More on this below... 1.> We are on the process of setting up Bitlocker on our laptops for OS enc= ryption and we are wandering if we should set up a PIN or not. If we do not= , the attacker can get to Windows login screen, but this is where he will s= top. You are correct, BitLocker is designed to protect your OS and data from off= line attacks when it is implemented properly. Once Windows is up and runni= ng, BitLocker does not do anything to protect the computer from network or = user based attacks. Once Windows has booted, Windows trusts the password c= omplexity to prevent the thief from logging into Windows. Any user that ha= s a valid username and password will have access to the BitLocker encrypted= OS and data. Again, BitLocker is to prevent offline attacks. =20 =20 2.> What happens if he boots with a linux live CD/USB? Can he decrypt the d= rive? The key is stored in the TPM. Does linux have access to the TPM? This is the offline attack scenario, and right up BitLockers alley! The dr= ives protected with BitLocker are encrypted on the disk. Any other OS inst= ance (including other Windows installations) can see the BitLocker partitio= ns, but they are unreadable. These other OS instances "see" these partitio= ns as either 1) encrypted partitions 2) unusable partitions, or 3) unused s= pace. Another OS could delete or reformat BitLocker volumes. The value TPM brings is that the TPM chip "uniquely pairs" to your unique i= nstallation of Windows. If the user boots from any other OS, even another = copy of Windows, that "other instance" is foreign to the TPM; hence the TPM= will not share the information that is needed to read the BitLockered driv= e(s). TPM is built to do a very good job of=20