Re: families
Michel Arboi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.nessus.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Erik <[email protected]> writes: > What about removing the restriction for a plugin to belong to only one > "family"? Instead of a 'family' field, how about something like a > 'keywords' or 'families' field This has been discussed. That looks like a good idea but need some changes in the core product (and the protocol?) Anyway, we should decide what families are used for. I think they are good to select or unselect a set of plugins. Apart from DoS (which could be removed by an enhanced safe_checks, as I said), I think that families are useful to find and enable or disable a specific plugin, or to select a whole set, e.g Windows or HTTP & CGI _______________________________________________ Nessus-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus-devel