Re: families
Michel Arboi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.nessus.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Johnston <[email protected]> writes: > I would favor arranging the families by "how the plugin works". Another suggestion was to have several levels, but this is not possible currently. > service_detection > banner_check OK for this, they are my "exceptions". > registry_check > http_file_existence > cross_site_scripting OK. This means that instead of having huge "Windows" or "HTTP" families, we spit then in several families. Looks good. Anybody against this proposal? The next questions will be: - What are the new families? - When do we switch? - Who does the job <grin> _______________________________________________ Nessus-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus-devel