Re: Move port selection from general options to target selection?

On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:02:18PM +0100, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 03:40:45PM +0100, Renaud Deraison wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> > > I wonder whether it makes more sense for Nessus GTK Client
> > > to have the port selection on the same page with the
> > > target selection since the ports are also some
> > > sort of targets.
> > 
> > 
> > The ports are not some sort of targets. The port range changes the
> > behavior of the whole scan. They should stay close to the port scanners
> > and to the "consider unscanned port as closed" option.
> 
> OK.
> So, would it be a good idea to put all of these port-related options
> into a page of their own: "Port selection" (right above "target
> selection")?
> I think they deserve a page of their own apart from the other "general"
> options.

there seems to be no veto :-), so I will go for it as proposed ...

Best

	Jan
-- 
Jan-Oliver Wagner               http://intevation.de/~jan/

Intevation GmbH                      http://intevation.de/
FreeGIS                                http://freegis.org/
_______________________________________________
Nessus-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus-devel