Re: Restore Sessions vs. Manage Reports on Server
Jan-Oliver Wagner <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:47:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.nessus.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, in a discussion with Renaud it turned out that these features of session saving should be removed from the GTK client for now. So I did and removed some of the code (still archived in CVS). However, I did not remove all unneeded code because I fear to break the KB feature. Best Jan On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 03:38:40PM +0100, Renaud Deraison wrote: > > That being said, I'm considering getting rid of session saving > > altogether. Not many people use them, it's an under-tested feature, > > session restoration is quite slow, and I'd like to simplify the source > > code of nessusd as much as possible. > > > > So I'd advise you to leave that part alone for the moment. At worse, > > I'll re-implement it "correctly" in the future, but at this time it > > just gets in the way. > > OK, so I could make it just a "Manage Reports on Server" feature in the GTK > GUI. That means > > 1. to have a special dialog to do this management > (2 actions: Import or Delete a Report). > This is essentially the corresponding list widget and buttons of the > current target page. > 2. Move the configure option "store session on server" of the target > page to the page "general" as "store reports on server". > 3. The option "store empty session" of the target page could be disable > for the GUI as it makes no real sense in this context. > > This proposal is actually another view on the session-saving feature for > the user. This view is a more narrow one than what the session-saving > is actually able to do and it basically says: you can store your reports > on the server and retrieve them from different clients. > > Eventually, once you decided how to proceed with the session saving > feature it is possible to change the view again and reactivate some > GUI code. > > Is this a reasonable approach? > (quick response would be appreciated, we are trying to have Nessus > GTK Client feature-complete by the end of this week). -- Jan-Oliver Wagner http://intevation.de/~jan/ Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/ FreeGIS http://freegis.org/ _______________________________________________ Nessus-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus-devel