Re: unix compliance checks - file ownership

"Doug Nordwall" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.nessus.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
rhel 4
Linux  2.6.9-67.0.15.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Apr 22 13:50:33 EDT 2008 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux

cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update 6)

the compliance file I used was the default CIS RHEL4 from Tenable's website

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Doug,
>
> What *nix flavors are you seeing this on (uname -a)? Also, would you please
> send me the pertinent .audit file portions, I'd like to test this. Thanks!
>
> Paul Davis
>
> Doug Nordwall wrote:
>
>> so, we have boxes (many) with 2 UID 0 accounts. most compliance checks
>> that look for root ownership report back that the file is owned by the
>> second UID 0 account. For instance
>>
>> 6.4 Verify /etc/shadow File Permissions : [FAILED]\n\nFile :
>> /etc/shadow\nRemote value: owner: mymyroot group: root mode: 0400 attr:
>> ------------- \nPolicy value: owner: root group: root mode: 0400 \n\n
>>
>>
>> when in fact it's owned by UID 0. here's some other interesting nuances to
>> that
>>
>> [10:43 AM - me@mybox ~] getent passwd root
>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
>>
>> [10:43 AM - me@mybox ~] getent passwd myroot
>> myroot:x:0:0:My Root:/myroot:/bin/csh
>>
>> [10:43 AM - me@mybox ~] getent passwd 0
>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
>>
>> [10:43 AM - me@mybox ~] ls -al /etc/shadow
>> -r--------  1 root root 1097 Jun  2 03:04 /etc/shadow
>>
>> [10:45 AM - me@mybox ~] cat /etc/passwd | grep ":0:"
>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
>> myroot:x:0:0:My Root:/myroot:/bin/csh
>>
>>
>> So, the second UID 0 account is after root in the passwd file. getent
>> returns the right value, listing the root account. Also, my own test using a
>> sudo account shows that it's doing an ls -lnd on /etc/passwd, and that even
>> reports back uid 0. So, i'm guessing that the compliance check is taking the
>> last entry. This is causing a false positive
>> --
>> Doug Nordwall
>> Unix, Network, and Security Administrator
>> You mean the vision is subject to low subscription rates?!!? - Scott
>> Stone, on MMORPGs
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nessus mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
>>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Paul Davis
> Research Engineer
> Tenable Network Security Inc
> Phone: 410.872.0555
> www.tenablesecurity.com
>
> Is your network TENABLE?
>



-- 
Doug Nordwall
Unix, Network, and Security Administrator
You mean the vision is subject to low subscription rates?!!? - Scott Stone,
on MMORPGs

_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.