Re: Remote host dead?

Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.nessus.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

I can confirm 3.2.1 for Windows is buggy.

What I did (using my laptop with 3.2.1 version):
- scan a host (my website) -> Failed (Remote host dead)
- reinstall Nessus 3.2.1 and repeat the test -> Failed again
- uninstall 3.2.1 and install 3.2.0. Repeat the scan -> Succeded!
- upgraded plug-ins (keeping 3.2.0) and repeat the scan -> Succeded!

So it seems not a problem in plug-ins but in Nessus 3.2.1 (Windows). At the 
moment, my advice for windows users would be downgrading to 3.2.0.

During the tests, I monitorized traffic with Wireshark:
- remote host dead -> Nessus sent two SNMP probes ; and received two icmp 
responses, because snmp target port is closed. Nothing more.
- alive -> Like the former one but then Nessus continued sending tcp 
packets! :-)

Since Sergio had the same problem, I'm wondering if the problem is known 
and whether it is being reviewed.

Regards,
-Roman

Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez escribió:
> Sergio, which Nessus version are you using?
> 
> I have 3.2.0 (windows) on my desktop and in my case could solve the problem 
> by activating "icmp ping" (as sugested by George). This was possible 
> because the scanned host is responding to icmp echo (although it's got 
> closed all the ports used by "tcp ping").
> 
> I've got 3.2.1 (windows) on my laptop and it's not working at all against 
> the very same host. I thought it's a problem in my laptop, not Nessus'. But 
> if you confirm 3.2.0 worked for you but not 3.2.1... Please, could you 
> elaborate on that? Anyway, don't panic, I still think it could be some kind 
> of problem in my laptop (perhaps some antivirus module, etc.... although I 
> disabled Windows firewall and some antivirus services, and the problem 
> remains...).
> 
> Cheers,
> -Roman
> 
> Sergio Castro escribió:
>> I reported this exact same problem a few weeks ago.
>> I was running the previous version of Nessus with no problems whatsoever.
>> Then I updated to the latest version for Windows, and had this "remote host
>> is dead" problem too. Nothing changed in my system, and I tried to scan the
>> exact same hosts I was sucessfully scanning with the older version of
>> Nessus.
>>
>> With the help of Ron Gula, I went through the same troubleshooting you are
>> going through, with no results. I still can't scan hosts on the Internet,
>> only LAN.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sergio 
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> En nombre de Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez
>> Enviado el: Lunes, 23 de Junio de 2008 02:21 p.m.
>> Para: [email protected]
>> Asunto: Remote host dead?
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to scan a host with the default policy. The host is alive and
>> responding to pings. I got no results when scanning with Nessus 3.2.0
>> (Windows). Looking at scan.log (in he "logs" dir), I can see a "remote host
>> is dead". But my question is why? If I run nmap against the host, I can see
>> unprivileged ports open (>1024) and of course it's responding to ping. I
>> also entered 1-65535 in "port scanner range". No luck at all. Am I missing
>> something? Perhaps a bug in Nessus?
>>
>> Another question, how could I debug this? If I enable the option to "save a
>> packet capture of the scan", I couldn't find any new log on logs dir (where
>> should it be placed?)
>>
>> Log attached (IP stripped; I could provide it in private for
>> testing/debugging purposes):
>> [Mon Jun 23 20:56:43 2008][540] Use default port range [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48
>> 2008][540] user localuser : testing X.X.X.X (X.X.X.X) [540] [Mon Jun 23
>> 20:56:48 2008][540] Scan X.X.X.X using 21942 plugins [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48
>> 2008][540] user localuser : launching clrtxt_proto_settings.nasl against
>> X.X.X.X [1] [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48 2008][540] user localuser : launching
>> dont_scan_settings.nasl against X.X.X.X [2] [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48 2008][540]
>> user localuser : launching ssh_settings.nasl against X.X.X.X [3] [Mon Jun 23
>> 20:56:48 2008][540] clrtxt_proto_settings.nasl (process 1) finished its job
>> against X.X.X.X in 0.000 seconds [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48 2008][540]
>> dont_scan_settings.nasl (process 2) finished its job against X.X.X.X in
>> 0.000 seconds [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48 2008][540] ssh_settings.nasl (process 3)
>> finished its job against X.X.X.X in 0.000 seconds [Mon Jun 23 20:56:48
>> 2008][540] user localuser : launching snmp_settings.nasl against X.X.X.X [4]
>> [Mon Jun 23 20:56:52 2008][540] snmp_settings.nasl (process 4) finished its
>> job against X.X.X.X in 3.578 seconds [Mon Jun 23 20:56:52 2008][540] user
>> localuser : launching ping_host.nasl against X.X.X.X [5] [Mon Jun 23
>> 20:56:54 2008][540] ping_host.nasl (process 5) finished its job against
>> W.W.W.W in 2.921 seconds [Mon Jun 23 20:56:54 2008][540] user localuser :
>> launching dont_scan_printers.nasl against X.X.X.X [6] [Mon Jun 23 20:56:54
>> 2008][540] The remote host (X.X.X.X) is dead [Mon Jun 23 20:56:54 2008][540]
>> Finished testing X.X.X.X. Time : 6.718 secs, 6 plugins launched [Mon Jun 23
>> 20:56:54 2008][540] 1 hosts scanned
>>
> 

-- 

Saludos,
-Roman

PGP Fingerprint:
09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB  29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742
[Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ]
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.