Re: Nessus, Vista User Access Control and FDCC

"Randal T. Rioux" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.nessus.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, August 21, 2008 9:19 am, [email protected] wrote:
> Thanks for the update Ron, the  last I heard was OMB required all
> workstations that process government information to be FDCC Compliant.

All government owned systems, regardless of use.

> To be FDCC Compliant the workstation had to be configured with all of the
>  settings, if a single setting is changed the workstation is not FDCC
> compleant.
>
> I haven't heard of a deviation policy form OMB  being released,  so to
> the best of my knowledge deviation from the FDCC settings are not
> allowed.

OMB is the mandate, NIST (FDCC) is the policy. I've never seen an audit or
C&A package that didn't make gratuitous use of the "N/A" loophole. Like
airport security, such "regulations" are pure theatre and is the biggest
reason why I jumped that ship and became a filthy contractor.

Tangent example: Trusted Internet Connections (TIC)

Good luck in your new field! Burnout comes fast :-)

Randy


--------
top posting is evil


_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.