| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.security.nessus.general |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
ive been testing this against a Vista machine that is not patched, though
its not alarming. Looking to get a system with XP now, does plugin 34477
check for this on Vista as well? Ive run 34476 and get the same results
(though I do get some info that the remote registry cannot be read. Im more
interested in getting 34477 working though.
On Oct 24, 2008 10:38am, Tim Rupp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, gotcha. No, it's running just fine inside Nessus, but I was just
>
> doing a quick test from nasl and wasn't getting the result I expected.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification Renaud.
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
> Renaud Deraison wrote:
>
> >
>
> > On Oct 24, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Tim Rupp wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> Is there a setting in nessus that I need to have enabled to
successfully
>
> >> get past the
>
> >>
>
> >> os = get_kb_item ("Host/OS/smb") ;
>
> >> if ("Windows" >!
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> lines? I think something may be disabled somewhere because I have a
>
> >> vulnerable machine but if I just call the raw nasl script with
>
> >>
>
> >> /opt/nessus/bin/nasl -t IP file.nasl
>
> >>
>
> >> it exits right there. If I remove those lines, the nasl check works.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > The plugin is meant to run from within nessusd. If you remove these two
>
> > lines when running in command-line it will work, but when scanning from
>
> > within nessusd, this KB entry will be set by smb_nativelanman.nasl which
>
> > is a dependency of this particular plugin.
>
> >
>
> > Are you encountering a problem when running from within nessusd?
>
> >
>
> > -- Renaud
>
> >
>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Nessus mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
>
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus