Re: How do I chase down who is doing a multicast?

Yuri Slobodyanyuk <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:58:31 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.nmap.devel
Message-ID <CAJ8Xm1-uBqiG1+RCpwUdK5e9gTxwvJayy+QtXjC_VhqUcNVMYg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for sharing, funny how MS decided to implement this in their own way
- in multicast as a protocol no packets are supposed to be sent with the
source IP set to the multicast one. Even in this ( LLMNR ) case the Name
resolution response is sent back as unicast to the querying host by a very
specific host, why set src IP to the destination IP of the original query?
Go figure.
As to the scan I guess it depends on whether both sender and responder are
enabled on a host or just sender. In the first case you may try this NSE
scipr to solicit answers:
https://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/llmnr-resolve.html
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4795

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 4:00 AM, ToddAndMargo <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 04/06/2018 04:25 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/2018 04:23 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> How do I use namp to chase down who is doing a multicast
>>> (224.0.0.252) on my local network.
>>>
>>> My Windows Security log is gobsmacked with the following:
>>>
>>> Network Information:
>>>      Direction:        Inbound
>>>      Source Address:        224.0.0.252
>>>      Source Port:        5355
>>>      Destination Address:    192.168.202.215
>>>      Destination Port:        52860
>>>      Protocol:        17
>>>
>>> This gets me no where:
>>>
>>> # nmap -A -T4 -Pn 224.0.0.252
>>>
>>> Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2018-04-06 16:22 PDT
>>> Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 0.85 seconds
>>>
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> -T
>>>
>>
>> My firewall shows no traffic outbound to 224.0.0.252
>>
>
> Follow up:
>
> It transpires that this was being caused by Windows
> clients running the default Link-Local_Multicast_Name_
> Resolution (LLMNR).  The vclue was port 5355.
>
> So basically, EVERYONE was running it.  Fortunately,
> LLMNR is not routable.
>
> I turned LLMNR off on all the clients.  Let me know if
> you want me notes on how to do this.
>
> I would still love to know if there is a way to trace
> back a particular offender.
>
> -T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the dev mailing list
> https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
>



-- 
Taking challenges one by one.
http://yurisk.info

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/