Re: Proposal for ncat improvement
Ulrich Heuser <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:41:31 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.nmap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <VI1PR0801MB199814C6B9F91444602F5112FCA70@VI1PR0801MB1998.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> |
Dear nnposter, this was a perfect answer -- of course it helped to solve my little issue of missing the http-response due to connection closing by ncat. With the mentioned option --no-shutdown it behaves exactly as wanted. Thanks a lot. Btw., as I am using nmap on Windows/DOS, I was not aware of the above option for ncat. The Usage/Help of ncat under DOS does no mention the --no-shutdown option. Looking up the man page for ncat on Linux I found it well documented in the usage/help output. Cheers, Uli ________________________________ From: dev <[email protected]> on behalf of nnposter <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 21:41 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Proposal for ncat improvement On 12/11/18 5:01 PM, Ulrich Heuser wrote: > Dear all, > I found a relevant diff between the original netcat tool and ncat out of > nmap: > > On sending out a http-request by netcat the connection is kept alive for > a long period, and this supports receiving a http-response from the > addressed counterpart. > > With ncat the connection is closed after 1 sec., and the comm. > counterpart is not able to send a http-response to the ncat requestor > after that amount of time. > > > It would be useful to extend the options of ncat by a keep-alive > time-val. and to keep the connection open for such given period to allow While not exactly the same, would option --no-shutdown help in your situation? Cheers, nnposter _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/ _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/