Re: APC Powerchute software - expired Java Runtime certificate has detrimental effect on Win2k / Win2k3 and SBS Servers
"William (Bill) Hobson" <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:46:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ntbugtraq |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This problem can be worse than the problems that Michael had. We patched an Exchange 2003 server and rebooted it and it refused to boot. We wound up booting in safe mode and disabling the APC service to get it to boot. This happened only after three hours of frustrating testing to try and figure out why until one of us remembered that he had seen something about the APC problem. This one problem caused more down time than we have had on our email servers in the last three years combined! Shame on APC! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ William J. (Bill) Hobson Senior Networked Systems Administrator I Information Security Officer Network and Computing Support Services Texas Engineering Experiment Station 321 Wisenbaker Engineering Research Center 3126 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3124 Office: (979) 845-5808 FAX: (979) 862-1185 email: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Banjac Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: APC Powerchute software - expired Java Runtime certificate has detrimental effect on Win2k / Win2k3 and SBS Servers This week, we were baffled by a significant number of our managed client servers falling like dominos, each one exhibiting the same symptoms. Essentially, the consoles were dead or dead slow....couldn't open control panel or network properties, explorer was crashing (no desktop), IE was non responsive. Restart the server and the exact same symptoms reappear. Accessing the admin console across the network via RDP made no difference. At first sight, we were reasonably confident that the Server had been hijacked or hit by a virus. <snip> -- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --