Re: IE7 is a Source of Problem - Secunia IE7 Release Incident of October 2006
Jerome Athias <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:33:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.full-disclosure,gmane.comp.security.ntbugtraq,gmane.comp.security.bugtraq |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Mi/aster Liu Die Yu, I would like to let you know that i know you and i greatly respect your = work. I'm not a security expert, but when i speak about IE vulnerabilities; i = speak about Liu Die Yu just as when i speak about oracle vulnerabilities, i speak about *Litchfield when i speak about shatter attacks, i speak about Brett Moore when i speak about games vulnerabilities, i speak about Luigi Auriemma when i speak about web vulnerabilities, i speak about Rgod when i speak about office vulnerabilities, i speak about Class101 i speak also about HD Moore and more guys... it's just as speaking about reggae without speaking about Bob Marley or = about how to make money without to speak about Bill Gates (or Dave Aitel) So, for you and these respectable legends: I SALUTE YOU! We all have only one life, and not any time, but legends never die... Thanks /JA * LIUDIEYU dot COM a =E9crit : > Upon IE7 release, Secunia published SA22477 titled `Internet Explorer > 7 "mhtml:" Redirection Information Disclosure`. > > Here I figured a straightforward demo - navigate IE7 to: > * mhtml:http://www.google.com/url?q=3Dhttp://www.yahoo.com/ > Google redirects to Yahoo, Yahoo content is loaded, but browser > location is not updated. > > Microsoft blogs assure vulnerability brought up by Secunia is not in > IE7, technically, rather, it's Outlook Express; and as usual, words of > Microsoft were well honored by several public media sources. > > Microsoft do not even send the slightest comment that IE is a source > of problem - despite there involves cross-domain data compromise, HTTP > redirection, ActiveX(DOM also works) ... all in all, when this attack > happens, it got to be IE and no other. > > Let me sum up: in this case IE is vulnerable, only IE is vulnerable, > and Microsoft say "These reports are technically inaccurate: the issue > concerned in these reports is not in Internet Explorer 7 (or any other > version) at all". > > Upon seeing "mhtml:", it reminds of a magnificent historic incident > which also involved "mhtml:" -- an IE exploit so perfectly and widely > utilized that it made CERT suggest "Use a different web browser"(CERT > KB VU#323070), and firstly initiated the boom of Firefox. Of course > Microsoft is unlikely to say technically this is also not IE's > problem. > > At last allow me to put an off-topic yet sentimental complain ... > Quite a while ago, when I got IE exploits and Secunia broadcasted > about them, my name was in every news report; This month same > situation, codedreamer - original finder of the "mhtml:" thing > broadcasted by Secunia - was not properly given credit ... no > mentioning in news reports, no mentioning in the famous first ever IE7 > advisory SA22477, codedreamer made the whole thing yet Secunia gave > but one single line of credit in bottom of demo "The test is based on > Proof of Concept code by codedreamer". Let me say I'm a man who > believes in paying respect, thus I made this little complain, paying > my respect to codedreamer. > > > Best Wishes for All Firefox Surfers and Firefox 2.0 > > Liu Die Yu > 25 OCT 06 > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/