Re: Synchronizing on File Formating
Wolfgang Keller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.passwordsafe.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for your reply, Frank! >> B. Password Life Time >> It is open in format definition whether this field expresses a >> timepoint or a time span. I assume the former. >> >> --> I am using an "epoch" timepoint for values >> > > IIRC, no implementation supports this field yet, so go ahead, make a > decision, and document it. My preference for this field would be a > time difference in seconds. That would make the field independent of > the last modification time. E.g., it could be 90*86400 if the password > expired after 90 days. I'm not sure I understand. Did you mean "That would make the field *dependent* of the last modification time." ? Because that is what would have to happen if you suggest a time span. I see an advantage in making it a time point because a) points could be calculated by application on demand (e.g. by offering a selection of previous or standard distances), whereas b) points could be also fixed by user input (say you got a specific date posed by your chief-in-office), and c) points can be displayed and compared more easily where points are required (e.g. list of expiry dates etc.) In fact my library would not have to make necessary assumptions on the nature of this value, but I would strongly prefer to offer an interpretation in place of "to be seen later". ;) - Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf