Re: Account Lockouts
Michael Silk <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:24:47 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming,gmane.comp.security.web-applications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, If you are truly concerned about the visually challenged there could be a link to a sound which they must play ... but then what if they don't have speakers .. etc. The obvious solution here is to allow them to disable this seconday confirmation via a call to the helpdesk. As to the not-so obvious problem ... yes, it's an issue to be considered, but think about the problem that we are trying to solve ... IMO I wouldn't be concerned about this kind of attack. -- Michael On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:52:34 -0500, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:10:21 +1100, Michael Silk said: > > Hi, > > > > A pretty easy solution exists and is to use "http://www.captcha.net/" > > images before locking the account. > > The obvious problem is that a visually-challenged user is screwed. > > The not-so-obvious problem is that although it "proves" the person is a person, > it doesn't prove that the person who entered the response is the "alledged > person or script" you sent the image to. > > Some spammers have found a way to deal with these - they grab the image, and > pass it through to some *other* user as a captcha to get into a "free porn" > site or similar. So the user sees it, types it in for the spammer, and then > the spammer redirects the response to whoever originally sent it. > > >