Re: Account Lockouts
[email protected] Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:24:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming,gmane.comp.security.web-applications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:24:47 +1100, Michael Silk said: > If you are truly concerned about the visually challenged there could > be a link to a sound which they must play ... but then what if they > don't have speakers .. etc. You know that, I know that, but an amazing number of sites that try to deploy captchas don't actually *do* that... > As to the not-so obvious problem ... yes, it's an issue to be > considered, but think about the problem that we are trying to solve > ... IMO I wouldn't be concerned about this kind of attack. Actually, you *do* need to consider it. Remember we're positing the existence of a script designed to do nasty things by locking out 15K or so users. Sending the "user" a captcha to re-validate their userid isn't a good idea when there's a known way to beat the captcha. If you bobble this one, then all you've done is enabled the attacker to use the captcha to re-enable the userid so they can toss *another* bunch of invalid attempts for the purpose of locking the user out again..... In other words, the use of a captcha doesn't *add* any security at all here - and if a site Gets It Wrong by coding "if the captcha is solved, it's a person and not the script, so we can re-enable the account again" they're just extending the same failure mode....
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFBr5YIcC3lWbTT17ARAvRLAKCFTNFV/hpc9Lz09DTVKAEmq+GCSgCcCL79 JqoBzeMCO81xXh4U42KVmT8= =ScmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----