Re: Account Lockouts

[email protected] Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:24:09 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.programming,gmane.comp.security.web-applications
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:24:47 +1100, Michael Silk said:
>  If you are truly concerned about the visually challenged there could
> be a link to a sound which they must play ... but then what if they
> don't have speakers .. etc.

You know that, I know that, but an amazing number of sites that try to
deploy captchas don't actually *do* that...

>  As to the not-so obvious problem ... yes, it's an issue to be
> considered, but think about the problem that we are trying to solve
> ... IMO I wouldn't be concerned about this kind of attack.

Actually, you *do* need to consider it.  Remember we're positing the
existence of a script designed to do nasty things by locking out 15K or so users.

Sending the "user" a captcha to re-validate their userid isn't a good idea
when there's a known way to beat the captcha.  If you bobble this one, then
all you've done is enabled the attacker to use the captcha to re-enable the
userid so they can toss *another* bunch of invalid attempts for the purpose
of locking the user out again.....

In other words, the use of a captcha doesn't *add* any security at all here -
and if a site Gets It Wrong by coding "if the captcha is solved, it's a person
and not the script, so we can re-enable the account again" they're just extending
the same failure mode....
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFBr5YIcC3lWbTT17ARAvRLAKCFTNFV/hpc9Lz09DTVKAEmq+GCSgCcCL79
JqoBzeMCO81xXh4U42KVmT8=
=ScmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----