Re: Account Lockouts
"Jason Coombs" <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:38:59 +0000 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming,gmane.comp.security.web-applications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <966613740-1102010375-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-16612-@engine69> |
> run into problems with large proxies > if you use this approach, but Somebody should assemble a centralized list of these terrible beasts, large proxies. My preference is to presume that the IP is that of an attacker first, and whitelist the known large proxies. Jason Coombs [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: "David LeBlanc" <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:41:09 To:"Harrison Gladden" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Account Lockouts This depends on the asset you're trying to protect. If it is a bank, maybe I want to force someone to call. This would be hard to implement, but if you could also track the source IP of the logon, you could then only allow some small number of user names to be tried from any one IP address. Won't protect you from an army of bots, but ought to get rid of most of the anklebiters. You may run into problems with large proxies if you use this approach, but again, this depends on your use scenario. Injecting some randomization into the user names would make sense. Make the attacker guess as much as possible. -----Original Message----- From: Harrison Gladden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:52 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Account Lockouts Hello all, My question to the group is about handling account lock outs. Here's the situation, assume there is a web interface that lets users log in and do stuff, but the log-in process is constrained by the network restrictions as well.. Meaning if a user tries to log in X times in Y seconds and fails each time, then the account get locked out. What are successfull techniques that could be used on the web interface to avoid having a script run against it that would potentially lock out 15000 user accounts, and create a headache for the system administrators who have to manually unlock each account? Also assume the current user account names are known by everyone. Possible techniques we've thrown around: 1) Allow each user to pick their own username instead of using a standard (i.e. First 3 letters of first name + Full last name) 2) Create a set time-out period for each account of X (maybe an hour) Hopefully my question makes sense. Thanks, Harrison -- ___________________________________ Harrison Gladden <[email protected]> Computer Engineer & Science Major ~Past experience: He who never makes mistakes, never did anything that's worth.~