Re: What do you take for secure programming?
Chris <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jan 2005 04:54:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This will probably start an arguement but 'secure programming' can be interpreted a lot of ways. To me it means using functions that arent known for their security risks. Or using a secure library that has all 'secure' functions. I can go on and on, but at its most basic meaning I think secure programming is typically reviewing what youve wrote to make sure their are no obvious vulnerabilities. Coding and programming mean the same thing to me, one just sounds cooler ;) Chris @ cr-secure.net ehdr.net Gustavo Rios wrote: | Hey folks, | | i am very new to this mailing list, this is just my first message. | I wonder what you take for "secure programming" ? | | Are you folks aware about the difference between coding and | programming ? I am sure you plenty of guys/girls here are, but it | is worthy to refresh it, isn't it ? Don't take me wrong, please, | but i do ask that cause i have heard about many "secure | programming" techniques that are simply put misguided. And the most | amazing is that there are plenty of folks around "buying" many | wrong concepts. I hope this mailing list may clarify the ones i | bought myself too (we all do, in different amounts, of course). | | Thanks for your feedback. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB+Lo8Xpi1p4x0qXsRAq7pAJ4hgWeEEQO//q/UNqUqrXwgbc+KwwCfQTJE vRXGG3JnSdc/DFH8OXfMauM= =rDqF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----