Re: Your opinion on a valuable and feasible goal for a new source code auditing tool
Jordan Dimov <[email protected]> Thu, 20 May 2004 12:07:16 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming |
|---|---|
| Organization | NSEG |
| Message-ID | <1085044035.759.16.camel@playmate> |
I've never seen this done right (essentially, because it's not an easy thing to do). But if you can track all input data AND know where it can cause problems (at various system calls, etc), then you would have created the ultimate source-code auditing tool, since false negatives would be reduced dramatically without losing precision. Probably impossible to do without some sort of sandboxing, though. -- Jordan Dimov VP, Association for Information Security http://www.iseca.org/ On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 17:56, Jose Nazario wrote: > have a look at CQUAL, it does sort of what you want to do (taint > checking). while it does a good job, it's not terribly easy to do. you > could marry flow control analysis to input tagging and tracking and > essentially make it easier for the developer to use. > > ________ > jose nazario, ph.d. [email protected] > http://monkey.org/~jose/ http://infosecdaily.net/ >