RE: Charging customers on security
"Koen Vingerhoets" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:24:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm administrator of an online game, located at www.shimlar.com Although far from secure, we do our best to secure it as good as possible. Why? Not because we're payed... it's a 100% free game. We only do that to make OUR workload less. Example? If someone claims he's hacked, we can reply: "Why aren't the admin accounts never hacked? Change your password and keep it safe." If we would have a lousy security, we would have to solve every little problem... I agree that security is the last thing developpers have time for, sad as it seems. That's why software shouldn't be sold... but rented. At work, we develop a webapplication. If customers want extra's, we'll add them, for a price. It's a two way street: if we don't add, they won't pay the fee next year... but if they don't pay, they have a lousy application. Walking the thin line, but it works. We already made our customers sign agreements that we didn't take responsability if certain things weren't implemented. Koen -----Original Message----- From: ovi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Charging customers on security It's ridiculous. What are you saying ?? If I as a client, don't pay you for having a stable and secure program you sell me a buggy one???? Not even M$ is thinking this way anymore, although they continue to sell buggy OS. On Sunday 26 September 2004 22:40, wirepair wrote: > Charging for security of your own applications? That seems pretty backwards > to me. Why should the client who buys your software with the expectation > that it works and is secure have to pay for the fact that it isn't? So when > my seat belts are broken, and my tires randomly explode, I have to pay the > car manufacturer more money to get these features fixed? > > duh? > -wire > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:16:40 -0700 > > King Pang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Our company developers Microsoft Solutions and I am responsible for > > leading the security initiative in the corporation. I have spent a > > lot of time and effort on how we should apply security guidance to our > > product life cycle, such as adding threat modeling and doing security > > review. But after I have convinced them that security is important, > > we brought up a discussion on how we should charge our customers. > > > > Many of you have customer experience. They want to pay the minimum > > and have all the features. If they can choose not to pay, they won't. > > If we tell them threat modeling will add x human-weeks of development > > and we have to charge them x thousand dollars more, they won't pay. > > Moreover, they expect the system to be secure enough and if there is > > anything wrong, they would think that is our fault. > > > > If any of you have any experience on dealing security with customers > > and how you would deal with this issue, please throw in two cents. Any > > comments or related articles would help too. > > > > Warm Regards. > > -- > Visit Things From Another World for the best > comics, movies, toys, collectibles and more. > http://www.tfaw.com/?qt=wmf