Re: Charging customers on security
Jeroen van Drie <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:21:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Security is the holy grail. Even if you direct vulnerability experts to endlessly test and debug you might not have the resources or the option to do that to every line of code that you depend on (like in the operating system). Absolute security is unattainable. But educating clients and end users about security is vital. You can say we live in a market economy and someone is simply going to slap together a few lines of code and offer a lower price. But how many people bought a Yugo because it was the cheapest car? When buying a car, brand, style and safety are deciding factors too. Safety only became an issue when too many people suffered from the lack of it, and software is arriving at that turning point too. Crashing on the 'information superhighway' shouldn't have to be lethal. But those that did crash and are still in business have aquired a keen security awareness. Educating your customers about security is vital. Suppose joe cracker logs in with username paul and password paul, and joe cracker finds the delete button. Not only are you going to get the call, you're probably also going to be the first to figure out that someone hacked the system, you're probably going to have to fix it as well, and they're not going to be very understanding when you charge them for it. Suddenly their security has become your problem and liability. Issues like password and network security should not primarily be your responsibility, but they usually are. There is no predisposition towards learning something requiring a high level of abstract understanding without incentive. But there's plenty of material on the net (http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=botnet&btnG=Search+News) that will interest them and will make them start to wonder and become predisposed. Now is the time to sell your customers a Saab or Volvo.