[NT] Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mandiant First Response

SecuriTeam <[email protected]> 19 Dec 2006 19:22:35 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.securiteam
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com
- - promotion

The SecuriTeam alerts list - Free, Accurate, Independent.

Get your security news from a reliable source.
http://www.securiteam.com/mailinglist.html 

- - - - - - - - -



  Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mandiant First Response
------------------------------------------------------------------------


SUMMARY

Mandiant First Response is "an incident response tool to collect system 
information such as running processes, system services, registry 
information, event logs, and file lists from a local or remote host". The 
First Response agent (FRAgent.exe) can be installed and configured as a 
daemon on target hosts in order to collect information remotely via a 
First Response Command Console. Multiple vulnerabilities exist that could 
lead to a variety of attack payloads. Agents running in either HTTP or SSL 
mode are vulnerable to denial of service and server hijacking conditions. 
The server hijacking vulnerability present in HTTP agents can be further 
leveraged to allow a rogue process to intercept and modify legitimate 
agent/console communication, and force a Command Console to download 
arbitrary content and visit arbitrary URLs.

DETAILS

Vulnerable Systems:
 * MFR version 1.1.0 and prior

Immune Systems:
 * MFR version 1.1.1

Vulnerability #1: Denial of Service against an SSL agent through malformed 
client requests
When run in daemon mode, the First Response agent (FRAgent.exe) accepts 
remote connections from a First Response console via HTTP or a modified 
HTTPS implementation. By sending a series of specially-crafted requests to 
an SSL-enabled agent, it is possible to force the agent to throw an 
exception that is not properly handled. After this occurs, the agent's 
sockets will enter an indefinite CLOSE_WAIT state and all subsequent 
connection attempts will be refused. The service then must be restarted in 
order to recover and accept connections again.

Vulnerability #2: Denial of Service against an HTTP or SSL agent through 
Agent hijacking
An FRAgent daemon permits other processes to bind to the same socket 
addresses on which it is already listening. If FRAgent is bound to a 
0.0.0.0 wildcard address ("all interfaces"), a rogue process can intercept 
client connections by subsequently binding to the same port on a specific 
IP address. By hijacking an agent with a non-responsive listener, an 
attacker can effectively prevent all legitimate client connections.

Vulnerability #3: Command Console and Data Manipulation through HTTP Agent 
Hijacking
If an HTTP FRAgent daemon is hijacked, the attacker can control the 
response data sent to and processed by a client, as well as other aspects 
of client behavior. A rogue process can conduct a man-in-the-middle attack 
to redirect and modify all requests and responses between the client and a 
legitimate agent. The attacker can also send specially-crafted HTTP 
responses that force the client to visit arbitrary URLs and/or download 
arbitrary content. (NOTE: The use of HTTPS/SSL is default behavior for 
First Response; using cleartext HTTP requires manual configuration.)

Vendor Response:
Mandiant has confirmed the reports provided by Symantec and updated 
Mandiant First Response (MFR) to correct these issues. Version 1.1.1 is 
now available for download from  
<http://www.mandiant.com/firstresponse.htm> 
http://www.mandiant.com/firstresponse.htm. Mandiant advises all users of 
MFR to upgrade to 1.1.1 as soon as possible. Registered users of the 
software have been notified via email of availability of the upgrade.

During the course of our review we noted the following addenda to 
Symantec's analysis:

Vulnerability 1: The DoS condition was due to a design error where the 
Agent would choose to exit upon receipt of a malformed request. The exit 
was an explicit choice exercised by the code path and not caused by a 
buffer overflow or heap corruption. Version 1.1.1 addresses the explicit 
exit condition and correctly handles requests with malformed payloads, 
allowing the MFR Agent to continue operation while correctly rejecting 
malformed requests.

Vulnerability 2 and 3: The vulnerabilities are present because the MFR 
Agent opens its listening port in non-exclusive mode. Version 1.1.1 
correctly opens the port as exclusive, preventing the multiple-bind 
condition.

Mandiant would like to thank Brian Reilly and Scott King for discovering 
and notifying us of these vulnerabilities, and Symantec for their 
participation in public disclosure.

Recommendation:
Upgrade to MFR version 1.1.1, available at  
<http://www.mandiant.com/firstresponse.htm> 
http://www.mandiant.com/firstresponse.htm.

CVE Information:
 <http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6475> 
CVE-2006-6475,  
<http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6476> 
CVE-2006-6476,  
<http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6477> 
CVE-2006-6477


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The information has been provided by  <mailto:[email protected]> 
Brian Reilly.
The original article can be found at:  
<http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21548> 
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21548



======================================== 


This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list. 
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: [email protected] 
In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: [email protected] 


==================== 
==================== 

DISCLAIMER: 
The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. 
In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.