Re: ROUTES file and routing traffic
Shorewall via Shorewall-users <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:11:12 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.shorewall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2023-01-19 11:31, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:28:00AM -0700, Shorewall via Shorewall-users > wrote: >> On 2023-01-18 23:52, Simon Matter wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > > I am trying to route traffic from LOC to a network I have configured in >> > > the routes file. >> > >> Everything in LOC has the firewall running shorewall configured as the >> Default Gateway. Also, as mentioned in the original post with the >> entry in >> the routes file routing works as expected from the firewall. Also >> mentioned >> in the original post, is when everything is allowed in shorewall via >> the >> entry in the policy file, everything routes as expected from the LOC >> network. To me this says that "routing" works but the firewall is >> blocking. >> I may be wrong, but that is the assumption I am making since I have >> actually >> made a connection from LOC to the network exposed in kubernetes >> network. I >> am assuming I need a RULE to allow the traffic to pass, but since the >> kubernete network is not a ZONE, I am not really sure how that would >> look. > > Find where your kernel logfile is (/v/l/messages?) and see what it says > when the packets are being rejected. It ought to indicate the source > and dest zones. Add the necesary things to ./rules. > > If you're trying to connect loc=>loc, then you need "routeback" > Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT: IN=enp1s5 OUT=enp1s5 Above is the shorewall log for blocking the connection. Of course I have truncated the actual MAC/IP/PORTS etc... Do I need some type of forwarding rule?