Re: BLACKLIST options question
Holger Schramm <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:46:30 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.shorewall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24.02.23 22:58, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'm looking once again at trying to make sense of fail2ban's > documentation, with the goal of configuring fail2ban to *remotely* tell > my separate firewall box (a Ubiquiti EdgeRouter running Shorewall) to > drop addresses that attempt to abuse or attack mail or ssh ports. The > fail2ban example shorewall.conf file RECOMMENDS changing BLACKLIST from > the default "NEW,INVALID,UNTRACKED" to "ALL" in order to let it close > existing connections from hostile hosts. > > Are there any *non-obvious* side effects of this change that I should be > aware of? > > From the docs: https://shorewall.org/blacklisting_support.htm (scroll to the end of the page) "The documentation in /etc/fail2ban/action.d/shorewall.conf states that you should set BLACKLIST=All. A better approach when using BLACKLIST as the 'blocktype' is to specify the disconnect option in the setting of DYNAMIC_BLACKLIST. With BLACKLIST=All, every packet entering the firewall from the net must be checked against the dynamic-blacklisting ipset. That is not required when you specify disconnect." Kind regards, ~H _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users