Re: shorewall maintainance?
"Brian J. Murrell" <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:38:34 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.shorewall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 23:06 +0200, Tuomo Soini via Shorewall-users wrote: > > That way you unfortunately loose all dynamic firewall changes like > dns > resolving. Can you expand on that? How does foomuuri utilize DNS in it's rules? Is it simply resolving names to IP addresses at rule generation time or is it more sophisticated than that? You said "dynamic" so I am suspecting it's more sophisticated than that. > It is easy to manage firewall rules with ansible or similar. I think ansible is pretty heavy (python) for embedded platforms. > I think one of the most prominent features is ability to handle all > ipv6 > and ipv4 rules in same config. Yeah, that does sound attractive. I have for years been meaning to merge my Shorewall and Shorewall6 configurations but never have gotten around to it. Does foomuuri transparently handle the need for IPv4 [D]NAT (to traverse into a NATted network) along with it's single IPv4/IPv6 configuration syntax? Cheers, b.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE8B/A+mOVz5cTNBuZ2sHQNBbLyKAFAmehRWsACgkQ2sHQNBbL yKDw0gf+P/abE8DKqDKDGHofhtddRGOoNIHkecfbAMT1TfcQclADyOQ4U4qhODRI IRbpqQa5z9keWaifX3DOKJwxCRALpzMl0GLVtoiqtmaS+OwdcsOe5wSzoLjntqwJ 9L1MxVviYU6LHCX/pi5jwczm9A6mFtTyIujcEOdekkkTXkHq/deEqKiJxyrkzB9V mWkNgpEQ+XSC4WXik+j8jld4bI8emdAklbgKP8B+ul8jARRP0MwIObnUmWf0qXi3 DXb17IMobcgTQXJ2ZLWd4XYK+Rb4Tmjy71G9XBzaq9avsi/is99HZNNo91X6Xf6J ENmQ/RF64jlX6fnxz3ttyoZtqYDxRQ== =S+vG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----