Re: Shorewall maintenance
Phil Stracchino <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:43:49 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.shorewall |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fenian House Publishing |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/8/25 12:58, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Wayne Shumaker skrev den 2025-02-08 16:56: >> At 2/6/2025 02:25 PM, Winston wrote: >> >>> Shorewall (and Shorewall6) has been fantastic to me, as a multi-ISP >>> user. > > if that debian maintaince stops, one can still find older slackware that > still works, just remember to not keep using precompiled problems as > debian mostly is, or even stupid centos > > i prefer freebsd and gentoo for being fullt opensource and not > precompiled at all > > if shorewall will continue then ask how it could use nftables instaed of > iptables, and why its essently better ?, the kernel part is just another > cli to add it to kernel Yeah, it doesn't seem to me to be an insurmountable problem to update shorewall to emit nftables rules instead of iptables rules, unless nftables is nearly unrecognizably different from iptables. And if nftables IS nearly unrecognizably different from iptables, and yet they didn't incorporate a sanely human-readable layer into it during the rewrite, then perhaps that group of developers needs to not be in charge of Linux kernel firewalling any more. There's a reason we program in high-level languages, and a reason why Photoshop and GIMP are not simply hex bitmap editors, and why OpenOffice/LibreOffice is not just a raw-XML editor. The technology of translating human-readable instructions into machine-readable ones is around sixty years old now. We shouldn't still be having to configure firewalls in the firewall equivalent of machine code. Shorewall is effectively a compiler for firewalls. You'd think it wouldn't be the only one. -- Phil Stracchino Fenian House Publishing [email protected] [email protected] Landline: +1.603.293.8485 Mobile: +1.603.998.6958